Beyond Impressionism

Home › Day 5 · Auguste Renoir

Day 05

Pierre-Auguste Renoir

Pierre-Auguste Renoir · Pierre-Auguste Renoir

The painter of light and flesh — with feather-soft brushwork he captured moments of happiness in pearl-toned skin, the great master of Impressionist figure painting.

Life February 25, 1841 – December 3, 1919Nationality FrenchMovement Impressionism
Pierre-Auguste Renoir, 'The White Pierrot' (1901–02). According to the DIA's official description, the model is Renoir's son Jean Renoir — the future film director. Collection of the Detroit Institute of Arts (70.178, Bequest of Robert H. Tannahill).
· Pierre-Auguste Renoir, 'The White Pierrot' (1901–02). According to the DIA's official description, the model is Renoir's son Jean Renoir — the future film director. Collection of the Detroit Institute of Arts (70.178, Bequest of Robert H. Tannahill).
1901–1902 · Detroit Institute of Arts · Sources

Life

Pierre-Auguste Renoir was born on February 25, 1841, in Limoges, France, the son of a tailor, and around 1844 the family moved to Paris in search of better work. As a boy he showed a gift for music as well, singing in the choir of the Church of Saint-Roch (legend has it he was tutored by the composer Charles Gounod), and poverty pushed him at about thirteen into an apprenticeship at a porcelain factory. There he painted flowers and figures on white cups and vases while slipping off whenever he could to the Louvre. The porcelain-painting craft he learned then — laying thin, transparent color over a bright ground so that light shines back through it — would govern his canvases for the rest of his life. When the porcelain industry mechanized, he used the money he had earned painting fans and window blinds to enroll in 1862 in the studio of Charles Gleyre (registering at the École des Beaux-Arts around the same time), and there he met Monet, Sisley, and Bazille, forming lifelong friendships as they went out together to explore light in the open air. In 1868 he was accepted into the Salon with 'Lise with a Parasol,' and in April 1874 he showed work at the First Impressionist Exhibition. With masterpieces such as 'Dance at the Moulin de la Galette' (1876) and 'Luncheon of the Boating Party' (1880–81), he brought the happiness of city life and the shimmer of light on skin to its peak, and the Salon success of 'Madame Charpentier and Her Children' (1879) at last made him a popular painter. Yet after traveling through Algeria and Italy in 1881–82 and seeing the solid form of Raphael and the frescoes of Pompeii, he fell into deep doubt. "Around 1883 a break occurred in my work. I had pushed Impressionism as far as it would go, and I reached the conclusion that I knew neither how to paint nor how to draw," he recalled (the exact wording of the quotation varies somewhat from source to source). During this 'dry period' (période aigre, roughly 1883–87) he abandoned the blur of Impressionism and returned to Ingres-like draftsmanship and crisp outlines. In 1890 he formally married his longtime model and companion Aline Victorine Charigot, and they had three sons: Pierre (born 1885, a stage and film actor), Jean (born 1894, a film director), and Claude ("Coco," born 1901, a ceramicist). From the early 1890s rheumatoid arthritis began to twist his hands, and in 1907 the family moved to 'Les Collettes,' a farmhouse in the warm southern town of Cagnes-sur-Mer. Contrary to popular belief, he did not paint with 'a brush strapped to a paralyzed hand'; the accepted account is that he wrapped his stiffened fingers in bandages to protect the skin, gripped the brush with an assistant's help, and moved his whole arm to paint. In his final years he devoted himself to warm, ruddy, full-bodied nudes, and he died at Cagnes-sur-Mer on December 3, 1919, at the age of seventy-eight — only months, the story goes, after seeing one of his own paintings hung in the Louvre beside the old masters.


Style & Innovation

Within the Impressionist group, Renoir was the painter who never gave up the human figure. Where Monet chased light itself and the landscape, Renoir painted how that light trembled on a person's skin, on fabric, in the air of a dance hall. His innovation lay in drawing the dappled light of the outdoors onto the figure so that skin glowed with a pearly sheen, and in refusing to use black as the color of shadow — painting shade instead in cool complementary tones (blues, rose-pinks, soft violets) so that the flesh seems to radiate from within. 'Dance at the Moulin de la Galette' (1876) and 'Luncheon of the Boating Party' (1880–81) are declarations that filled the canvas with the leisure and happiness of the modern city dweller, and they became the very source of the popular notion that 'Impressionism means pleasure.' In this exhibition's seven-section narrative, Renoir is placed, after Courbet's Realism (Section 1), at the heart of 'Impressionism' (Section 2) alongside Monet, Degas, Pissarro, and Sisley — as the painter who translated the liberation of light into the human face and body. Indeed, the guiding image of this touring exhibition is Renoir's very own 'Woman in an Armchair' (1874), so much so that he is the face of the Impressionist section. But Renoir's true originality lies in the fact that he never settled into Impressionism. After his trip to Italy in 1881–82, he returned to the solid draftsmanship of Raphael and Ingres (the dry period, roughly 1883–87). In his final years he loosened the line once more and moved toward warm, ruddy, full-bodied nudes as soft as velvet — and the work in this exhibition, 'Seated Bather' (c. 1903–06), is the very essence of those late nudes. Within a single painter are contained three transformations — Impressionism, a return to the classical, and the late nudes — so that the exhibition's title, 'Beyond Impressionism,' is distilled into the life of Renoir alone.


Technique

The first thing to notice before a canvas by Renoir is that 'the kind of brushwork changes from area to area.' For skin he uses feathery touches rubbed so softly that the brushstrokes nearly vanish, along with a wet-in-wet technique of laying wet paint over wet paint, creating smooth, outline-free surfaces; for hair, the sheen of a forehead, and background foliage he uses short, thick impasto strokes. Just as he had learned as a porcelain painter, he laid down a white or light-colored ground and built up thin, transparent layers of color over it, so that the light of the ground passed through the paint layers and shone back — this is the secret of his distinctive 'pearl-toned skin that glows from within.' Look closely at the flesh and you will find an astonishing range of colors mixed in, from peach, yellow, and pink to blue-gray and violet, and the shade is rendered not in black but in cool complements, so that even the shadows are alive with color. From a conservation-science standpoint, X-ray and infrared examination of Renoir's works often reveals a working sequence in which he established the proportions with a faint charcoal underdrawing, then laid a warm ochre underpaint over it to build a 'luminous foundation'; such studies can also show pentimenti where a figure's pose or contour was revised, as well as deformations in the canvas weave and tacking edges (the detailed findings for each of the two works shown here can be found in the DIA conservation department's records). In front of the actual works, compare (1) the surface contrast in a late figure painting such as 'The White Pierrot,' where the skin is smooth and the costume and background are rough, with (2) the velvet-thick, ruddy surface texture of a late nude such as 'Seated Bather.' Because of the smoothness of his color layers, Renoir's craquelure tends to be relatively fine and evenly netted, and when the light catches it from the side, the differences in the thickness of the paint layers and a subdued sheen come into view. The 'contrast' where smooth skin meets rough background brushwork within a single canvas is the key to seeing Renoir.


Key Works

The White Pierrot
The White Pierrot · The White PierrotIn this showDIA collection
1901–1902 · Oil on canvas · Detroit Institute of Arts, accession no. 70.178, Bequest of Robert H. Tannahill · Sources

Why it matters

A signature figure painting from Renoir's later years (his sixties), the DIA's official description identifies the model as Renoir's son Jean — the man who would become a film director (some popular sources name the youngest son, Claude ("Coco"), but here we follow the DIA's attribution). A special work where the painter's family life meets his art, it blends eighteenth-century Rococo elegance with a modern sensibility in a single canvas and beautifully shows the late style in which the Impressionist handling of light has ripened and settled into soft flesh. It is shown in Section 2 (Impressionism) of this exhibition as the representative Renoir.

👁 What to look for

See that the 'white' of the white costume is never a single white — shadows of blue, gray, and yellow are mixed in to create the volume of the fabric and the direction of the light. The skill with which the many folds of the loose costume are rendered like weightless silk, and above all the point at which the smooth, feathery handling of the face and hands contrasts on one canvas with the short, broken brushwork of the costume and background, is the heart of viewing this work.

Backstory

Pierrot is a stock character of the Italian commedia dell'arte and French pantomime, a sad clown dressed in white. Renoir dressed his beloved son in this costume and posed him as the model. The work's provenance — confirmed by the DIA and related sources — runs from the artist himself (until 1919) → his third son, Claude Renoir → Paul Guillaume of Paris (before April 1935) → Edouard Jonas of Paris (1935) → purchased by the Detroit collector Robert H. Tannahill through the brokering of W. R. Valentiner (William R. Valentiner), the DIA's director and an art historian → entering the DIA's collection in 1970 through the Tannahill bequest (70.178). The model, Jean Renoir, went on to make his name in film history with 'The Rules of the Game' (1939) and 'Grand Illusion' (1937), and in his memoir 'Renoir, My Father' he vividly testified to his father's last years with stiffened hands.

Seated Bather
Seated Bather · Seated BatherIn this showDIA collection
c.1903–1906 · Oil on canvas · Detroit Institute of Arts, accession no. 70.177, Bequest of Robert H. Tannahill · Sources

Why it matters

The essence of Renoir's late nudes. A work that lends the female nude a luminous, dreamlike atmosphere through warm light and soft color, its 'gesture of lifting the hair,' as the DIA's description notes, gives off an air at once intimate and timelessly classical. Renoir even titled similar works 'Naiad (water nymph)' to underscore the classical inspiration of the nude. It is a precious entry that shows in a single piece his late style, in which — having pushed Impressionism to its limit — he moved on toward the classical and the nude.

👁 What to look for

Pay attention to the velvet-thick, ruddy surface texture. Unlike the cool, crisp surfaces of the Impressionist period, the late nudes are full and warm, with contours softly melting away. Compare the curve of the gesture lifting the hair, the variety of peach, pink, and blue mixed into the flesh, and how the surface texture differs from the same artist's Impressionist figure painting ('The White Pierrot').

Backstory

This work entered the DIA through the 1970 bequest of Robert Hudson Tannahill (1893–1969) (accession no. 70.177, Bequest of Robert H. Tannahill). According to the DIA provenance, the ownership history runs from the artist himself → Josse Hessel of Paris (c. 1914–1935) → Alex Reid & Lefevre, Ltd. of London → the Bignou Gallery of New York → purchased by Tannahill of Grosse Pointe Farms, near Detroit → and on to the 1970 DIA bequest. A note: the exhibition briefing listed this work as 'c. 1883–1884,' but the 'Seated Bather' that the DIA actually owns and shows is the late (c. 1903–1906) nude. The identically titled work of c. 1883–84 is a separate painting in the Harvard Art Museums (Fogg) collection (about 119.7 × 93.5 cm), and the two were confused in the briefing.

Woman in an Armchair
Woman in an Armchair · Woman in an ArmchairIn this showDIA collection
1874 · Oil on canvas · Detroit Institute of Arts, accession no. 1985.24, Bequest of Mrs. Allan Shelden III · Sources

Why it matters

A figure painting from the height of Renoir's Impressionist powers, painted in the very year (1874) the First Impressionist Exhibition was held, it is the face of this exhibition — used as the official guiding image of the Rome and Seoul tour. As the DIA's description notes, it has 'the spontaneity of a sketch even as a finished study,' capturing with rapid brushwork the play of dappled light over the model's face, arms, and torso. It is a work that distills Impressionism's exploration of the human form.

👁 What to look for

Enjoy the paradox of a work that 'looks like a sketch even though it is finished.' Quick, fearless brushstrokes glide over the face and skin, distinguishing the lit planes from the shaded ones through color. Note how blues and violets are used in the shadows instead of black, and how the boundary between background and figure is handled not as a crisp line but as a trembling of color. Set side by side with the late nude in the same exhibition, one painter's stylistic evolution can be seen at a single glance.

Backstory

According to the DIA's description, the identity of the woman in this painting is still unknown (Renoir often used young women of the lower classes as models). The ownership history is recorded as passing from Lemaire of Paris → Durand-Ruel → Van de Velde of Le Havre → through dealers and collectors in Paris → purchased by the Allan Sheldens in the late 1920s → and on to the DIA collection in 1985 through the bequest of Mrs. Allan Shelden III (accession no. 1985.24) (details such as the intermediate dates and sequence can be confirmed in the DIA's official provenance). It is said to have been shown in the 2022 'Renoir: Rococo Revival' exhibition at the Städel Museum in Frankfurt.

Graziella
1896
View the work →

Graziella · GraziellaDIA collection
1896 · Reported to be oil on canvas. · Detroit Institute of Arts — whether it is in the collection and its accession number can be confirmed in the DIA's official records. · Sources

Why it matters

Cited as another Renoir in the DIA's collection, it is said to show the 1890s style in which, having passed through the 'dry period' of the 1880s, he returned once more to soft lines and warm tones. Whether it is among the 52 works in this exhibition is not yet confirmed, but it is a reference work for understanding the breadth of the DIA's Renoir holdings (Impressionism → dry period → late). Whether it is in the collection and the further details can be confirmed in the DIA's official records and at the exhibition.

👁 What to look for

Compared with the firm nudes of the dry period of the 1880s, observe the traces of that 'reinvention' — how the Renoir of the 1890s loosened the line again, warmed his colors, and returned to a soft surface.

Backstory

The title 'Graziella' is thought to be connected to the name of a character in Alphonse de Lamartine's novel of the same title (1852). Whether the work is in the DIA's collection and whether it is in this exhibition are not yet confirmed, so it is best to check the exhibition checklist at the venue. (Note: the DIA also owns other Renoir works, such as 'The Spanish Guitarist' and 'Coco' (Claude Renoir).)


Behind the Canvas

01The painter's son becomes a film director

According to the DIA's official description, the model for 'The White Pierrot' is Renoir's son Jean (born 1894). Jean grew up to become a master who changed the history of world cinema with 'Grand Illusion' (1937) and 'The Rules of the Game' (1939). In his memoir 'Renoir, My Father,' he vividly testified to how his father painted with stiffened hands and what the light and color of the household were like. It is a rare case in which 'two ways of capturing light' (painting and film) passed down through a single family across generations.

02A former porcelain painter's 'pearl-toned skin'

Before he became a painter, Renoir as a teenager painted flowers and figures on white porcelain in a Paris factory. The porcelain-painting technique of laying thin, transparent color over a bright ground so that light shines back became the technical root of what would later be his trademark, 'skin that glows from within.' Losing his job to mechanization actually pushed him onto the path of painting in earnest.

03The Impressionist who doubted Impressionism

Renoir was a founding member of Impressionism, but after traveling through Algeria and Italy in 1881–82 and seeing Raphael, the frescoes of Pompeii, and the solid draftsmanship of Ingres, he fell into deep doubt. Confessing that 'around 1883 a break occurred in my work — I had reached a dead end where I knew neither how to paint nor how to draw' (the exact wording of the quotation varies somewhat from source to source), he abandoned the blur of Impressionism and returned to the classical style with its crisp outlines. At the end of this anguish he loosened the line once more and moved on to the warm nudes of his final years; the late nude in this exhibition, 'Seated Bather,' is the destination of that journey.

04The truth behind the legend that he 'strapped the brush to his hand'

In his final years Renoir's fingers stiffened like hooks from rheumatoid arthritis. It is often said that he 'painted with a brush strapped to a paralyzed hand,' but this is an exaggerated legend. In reality, the accepted account is that he wrapped his stiffened fingers in bandages to keep the skin from chafing, gripped the brush with an assistant's help, and moved his whole arm to paint. The saying 'the pain passes, but the beauty remains' is often quoted as the anecdote that sums up his final years.

05Tannahill's bequest made the DIA's Renoirs

The DIA's Renoirs 'The White Pierrot' (70.178) and 'Seated Bather' (70.177) both entered the museum through the 1970 bequest of the Detroit collector Robert Hudson Tannahill. The Tannahill collection was a treasury of modern art spanning Cézanne, Van Gogh, Gauguin, Degas, Seurat, Matisse, and Picasso, and it became the foundation that allows the DIA to mount touring exhibitions like this one today. 'The White Pierrot' in particular was a work Tannahill obtained through the brokering of the art historian W. R. Valentiner, then the DIA's director (confirmed by DIA provenance).

What to check in person

  • Look at the skin up close — you can see for yourself the 'feathery touch' rubbed so softly that the brushstrokes nearly disappear, and the 'pearly' glow of the bright ground shining up from beneath. The smoothness of the surface, which a reproduction can never show, is the key.
  • Look at the 'color' of the shadows. Renoir painted the dark areas not in black but in blue, rose-pink, and soft violet. Squint and search out which colors hide in the shaded parts of the flesh, and you will understand why he is called a 'painter of color.'
  • Compare the differences in brushwork from area to area within a single canvas. The delight of viewing Renoir is in seeing how, in 'The White Pierrot,' the smooth handling of the face and hands contrasts with the short, broken touches of the white costume and background.
  • In the late nude 'Seated Bather' (c. 1903–06), pay attention to the velvet-thick, ruddy surface texture. Seen alongside the same artist's Impressionist figure painting ('Woman in an Armchair,' 1874), the stylistic evolution from Impressionism → classical → late nude comes into view at a glance.
  • Look at the subtle variations of white. The white costume of 'The White Pierrot' is by no means a simple white — shadows of blue, gray, and yellow are mixed in to create the direction of the light and the volume of the fabric. This is the place to see how varied the 'white' of a masterpiece can be.
  • Look at the surface craquelure and sheen at an angle. Because of his smooth color layers, Renoir's cracking spreads finely and evenly like a net. Viewed with the light catching it from the side, the differences in the thickness of the paint layers and a subdued sheen come into view.
  • Look while recalling who the model is. According to the DIA, the model for 'The White Pierrot' is his son Jean Renoir, who would later become a film director. Feel how the painter's tender gaze upon his child is steeped into the tip of the brush.
  • In 'Woman in an Armchair,' look for the living spontaneity of brushwork that is as quick as a sketch even though the work is finished. How he captured in a single stroke the moment of light gliding over the face, arms, and torso is the spirit of the height of Impressionism in 1874. Take it in while recalling that this painting is the exhibition's representative image.

Connections

Renoir built Impressionism together with Monet, Sisley, and Bazille, whom he met in Gleyre's studio (in this exhibition's Section 2 he stands alongside Monet, Degas, Pissarro, and Sisley). But after being captivated in Italy in 1881–82 by the classical draftsmanship of Raphael and Ingres, he went through a 'crisis of Impressionism' and took a path that also connects with the 'return to structure' chosen by Cézanne in Section 3 — Cézanne and Renoir were in fact friends who even worked together in the 1880s. Renoir's warm color and his focus on the figure left their traces, in later years, on Matisse's liberation of color (Section 5) and on the early figure paintings of Picasso (Section 6). Within the same exhibition's flow from Courbet's solid Realism (Section 1) → Renoir's light (Section 2) → Cézanne's structure (Section 3), the life of Renoir alone (Impressionism → return to the classical → late nudes) reads like a miniature of the entire exhibition. And through his son Jean Renoir, the model for 'The White Pierrot,' two arts — painting and film — are carried on within a single family.

Did You Know

According to the DIA's official description, the model for 'The White Pierrot' (1901–02) is Renoir's son Jean Renoir. This child grew up to become a master of twentieth-century cinema who made 'The Rules of the Game' and 'Grand Illusion' — if the father captured light on canvas, the son captured it on film.
The official representative image of this exhibition (the Rome and Seoul tour) is Renoir's 'Woman in an Armchair' (1874) — chosen as the work that shows the essence of Impressionist figure painting in a single piece.
Before he became a painter, Renoir painted pictures on white porcelain in a factory. The technique of 'transparent color over a bright ground' he learned then is the technical root of the pearl-toned skin that marked his whole career.
In his final years Renoir's fingers were so severely stiffened by rheumatoid arthritis that he wrapped them in bandages to protect the skin and painted by gripping the brush with an assistant's help and moving his whole arm. It is often said he 'strapped the brush to his hand,' but this is a somewhat exaggerated legend.
The DIA's Renoirs 'The White Pierrot' (70.178) and 'Seated Bather' (70.177) both entered the museum through the 1970 bequest of Robert Hudson Tannahill — a prime example of how the Tannahill collection became a pillar of the DIA's modern art.
⚖ Notes still to verify
  • The legend that the late Renoir painted with 'a brush strapped to his hand' — low: The accepted account is that he did not strap a brush to a paralyzed hand, but wrapped his stiffened fingers in bandages to protect the skin and gripped the brush with an assistant's help. The phrase 'strapped' is regarded as an exaggerated legend. That said, it is true that his hands were so severely deformed that he could not grip a brush normally.
  • 'Graziella' (1896) — whether it is in the DIA's collection, the origin of the title, and further details — low: The connection to Lamartine's novel of the same title (1852) is conjecture. Whether it is in the DIA's collection, details such as dimensions and accession number, and whether it is in this exhibition are not yet confirmed, so it is best to check the DIA's official records and the exhibition venue.
  • The Seoul showing of the two key works and 'Woman in an Armchair' — medium: All three works are in the DIA's collection and are confirmed to have been shown in the Rome tour. Since Seoul is the same 52-work tour, the likelihood of their being shown is very high, but touring exhibitions sometimes swap out certain works. The Seoul checklist can be confirmed definitively at the venue.
Sources (18)
Buy me a coffee